Both.
Did you click on the link? You might find it interesting.
I clicked the link...it was a false dichotomy...a set up.
Maybe a set up, but there is a lot of good information for the having on the sites.
You don't think it's a false dichotomy?
Do you think it is a false dichotomy because the "liability" side did not sent you to an anti-gun web site?Or is it that there are just two choices, basically black and white?
The choice is obviously over-simplified. THe readers are expected toknow that the page is a rethorical device for self-reflection.
It's not an either/or.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to feed
8 comments:
Both.
Did you click on the link? You might find it interesting.
I clicked the link...it was a false dichotomy...a set up.
Maybe a set up, but there is a lot of good information for the having on the sites.
You don't think it's a false dichotomy?
Do you think it is a false dichotomy because the "liability" side did not sent you to an anti-gun web site?
Or is it that there are just two choices, basically black and white?
The choice is obviously over-simplified. THe readers are expected toknow that the page is a rethorical device for self-reflection.
It's not an either/or.
Post a Comment